*As part of our commitment to promote civil discourse on complex issues, the Marblehead Ministerial Association held a panel presentation on A Question #2, Death With Dignity. Member, Rev. Susan Morrison moderated. Panelists included Rabbi David Meyer, Dr. Kerry Pound, Dr. Suzana Makowski and me. What follows are my comments.
For me, this isn’t a question about death. It’s a question about life. How is it we want to spend the last minutes
of living, who gets to choose and what our options might be. Having sat with so many people during their last days of living
I have enormous respect for the wish to be able to choose how one spends those
last days. While science and medicine have made enormous strides in pain
management, some people endure hideous endings. Certainly, for some, a
wish to live as long as possible and to die 'naturally' is a cognizant choice.
I have watched people go to extraordinary lengths to live longer and dip
into stores of unimaginable strength to bear pain. I have admiration for those people. It was their choice.
I have also watched people give up on life with what seemed to
me, too little fight. People who said no
to drugs, to treatment, to what some might say was life. It took more work for me to find admiration
for those people, but I did, because it was their choice.
And I have watched people all along the spectrum. Those who tried one more thing so they could
live to see a grandchild’s wedding.
Those who survived rounds of chemotheraphy to the benefit of their
health but who told me privately “I will never do that again. It wasn’t worth it. If I had known, I would have opted out.” I had and have admiration for each because it
was their choice.
We live in a complex world, made more complex by science. We are faced with scientific capacities at
times ahead of our ethical, moral and spiritual capacities. We have living wills, Do not resuscitate
orders, and hospice care. But what we
have always had is choice. Whether it
was legal or not, people have been choosing all along. In conversation with a relative I just found
out an uncle dying of lung cancer had a stash of pills under his mattress –
almost 30 years ago. The Hemlock Society
formerly began in 1980 seeking to provide information to people and supporting
physician-assisted suicide. The
opportunity we have today is to stop seeing this choice as criminal or morally
less-than whole or cowardly. Our current
system is cited as protective but it, in fact, criminalizes a path many already
take to alleviate horrific suffering. This places an unnecessary pain
upon family members and friends. It often requires the loved person at the
center to hide pain, hide pills and ultimately, hide their death. All
this at a time when, in the healthiest of circumstances, we are surrounded by
those we love, supported in all we wish to do and held as we complete our
living. To have our last living marred by a denial of a valid choice is
not life affirming.
I’d like us to stop even seeing it as suicide.
Dying is a part of our living.
It comes in many forms. We see
murder as a horrific assault to life.
Suicide as a sad ending.
Accidents as tradgedies. Each are
different endings and invoke different emotions. Dying as we approach an inevitable ending is
its own kind of ending and one that uniquely invites our cognizant and informed
involvement – should we so choose. For
those whose final days, weeks and month include great suffering, that
involvement can be life affirming.
I will tell you that I had some serious questions as I approached
this vote. I have had close ties with
the special needs community all of my life.
I spend 6 hours in a pool with children with special needs each week,
coach children, youth and adults on a special Olympics swim team and lead an
interfaith worship group specifically designed for people of all ages with special needs,
their families and friends. I worry
about the existing abuses in this community and know it to be an historically
marginalized at-risk community. The
questions I took to this question, question #2, was where are the
protections? Does passage increase the
risk to this population? Does the
benefit extend to this population? My
conclusions are that we need continued vigilance in our entire society toward
the protection of marginalized communities, we need to root out current abuses
in elder homes, homes for those with disabilities and in medical facilities and
schools. This bill neither solves those
problems nor increases them. It is my
hope that it encourages greater levels of attention in that larger system.
And now, I want to speak as a daughter. My father struggled with Multiple Sclerosis
for over a decade. He died just four
years ago. I say struggled because it
was a struggle. Emotionally, physically
and spiritually. I watched him lose
things each year. We all did. We watched a man who skied, sailed, walked to
the beach with his grandchildren, danced beautifully, walked, traveled, carved
wooden ducks, filled his many birdfeeders, go out to lunch with his friends,
the Romeos (Retired Old Men Eating Out) lose these things and mourn each
one. With each loss came some sadness,
some depression, some adjustment and then he would live on. As is the case in many families, we each
played different roles. My mother, his
beloved, still danced alongside him, as beloveds do, focusing on what he could
do, how to support him best, even learning to administer shots and other
medications. Me – he chose me to talk
about pain. In quiet moments when it was
just the two of us, he would say ‘the worst thing, the very worst thing is the
pain.’ It could be hideous. He told me once that he had a stash of pills. All I did was listen. I think his doctor knew. They may have even discussed it. He never used those pills. But it meant something to know he could. That if the pain became too great, he could
choose to complete his living, on his terms.
This was a man who had the very best medical
care. Team Ted was grand. He had pain management. He had an integrated team who spoke to each
other across hospitals. He had a close
and loving family able to provide anything he needed for comfort. He was strong. And he wanted to have the choice to say the
pain is too great. I’m done.
Was he depressed?
Who wouldn’t be. And that
depression was treated during his illness.
This bill invites a close look at depression. But I also want to speak about our rights to
our feelings. Depression from a loss of
the ability to travel or the loss of the ability to ski is something to seek
help in getting over. I think we all can
see that. Depression from the loss of
driving, the loss of dancing with your beloved.
That’s harder but surely, help getting past that sadness is
welcome. I think we can probably agree
on that as well. Depression from losing
the use of your legs or being able to speak.
Now we’re in tricky territory.
That’s pretty depressing even to say.
I think folks in that territory have some heavy lifting to do and I hope
they want help doing it, but I can’t say you ought to get past that. But I am clear that when it comes to
depression because I’m about to die. I
support feeling the depth of that emotion.
It’s real, it is depressing. It’s
sad. It’s full of I’m leaving all this
beauty. I cannot find anything to be
‘fixed’ or gotten over. For me, the
worry that someone’s depression at that point will cloud their decision is one
thing, but the answer isn’t to change the depression, it’s to be sure they are
clear on their wishes as they move forward.
The assumption should not be they are choosing to end their living
because they are sad.
A couple of weeks before my dad died, I watched
him in agony at the hospital. He then
slipped off into a nonresponsive state.
After some time, Hospice was engaged and we were preparing to have him
moved. Suddenly he popped back into our
lives. He lived for a bit more. Did we take advantage of those moments? Of course we did just as we treasured each
and every moment leading to his death.
But had he chosen to use his pills two weeks earlier who would have been
robbed? Us, for not having those final
goodbyes? Us, left wondering what if a
discovery were made that next week that would help cure MS? Me, because I wanted my Dad to live
forever?
For me, the spiritual question is not how can it
be okay for any one of us to decide when to end our lives. Rather it is how can we find the generosity
of spirit and the strength to affirm when a loved one says ‘it’s time to end my
suffering. Please tell me you love me
and then show me by letting me go.”
No comments:
Post a Comment